Unknown Unknown Author
Title: Court Strikes Out PDP’s Suit Against Defected Governors
Author: Unknown
Rating 5 of 5 Des:
Tweet A Federal High Court in Abuja on Friday struck out the suit filed by Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) seeking to sack the four go...


A Federal High Court in Abuja on Friday struck out the suit filed by Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) seeking to sack the four governors who defected from the party to the All Progressives Congress (APC).

The PDP had last December sued the governors, including former Adamawa State governor, Murtala Nyako and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), asking the court to declare the defecting governors’ seats vacant and for INEC to conduct elections for their replacement. Shortly after the suit was filed, Nyako was impeached and his name was removed.

The remaining four are Rotimi Amaechi (Rivers), Aliyu Wamakko (Sokoto), Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso (Kano) and Abdulfatai Ahmed (Kwara).

Justice Kolawole’s ruling was on applications filed by Ameachi, Kwankwaso and Ahmed. He upheld the governors argument that the originating processes, issued in the Abuja division of the Federal High Court, and meant for service outside jurisdiction, ought to be endorsed as required under Section 97 of the SCPA.

He held that the plaintiff acted in violation of the provision of Section 96 of the SCPA as it ought to have applied for and obtained the court’s leave before engaging in substituted service.

The judge rejected the argument by lawyer to the PDP, Dr. Alex Iziyon (SAN), to the effect that the the governors could be served through their new party’s address.

The judge also held that since APC was not a party in the suit, which was meant to sack the governors, it was wrong to provide the APC’s address as the place where the governors could be served.

On the plaintiff’s argument that the defendants had exceeded the seven days limit for them to challenge the order for substituted service, the judge held that the provision of Order 26 Rule 11 of the Federal High Court Civil Procedure Rules does not apply in view of the fact that the order made on June 27 for substituted service was an ex-parte order, which is not covered by the provision.

He consequently declared the originating summons filed by the PDP invalid by virtue of its not being endorsed as required by law.

To get our news on your finger tip, Add us up on bbm Channel C004869CD. Do you have any story for us Email us at maryanneyo2@gmail.com

Follow Us
  Maryann Blog
 http://twitter.com/maryann3n maryann3n
 http://instagram.com/maryann3n maryann3n


Kitchen and dinning 336x280

About Author

Advertisement

Post a Comment

PLACE YOUR COMMENT IN THE COMMENT BOX

 
Top