The case originally began in 2013 when the 26-year-old singer sued Topshop’s parent company Arcadia for $ 5 million (£3.3 million), claiming the use of her image suggested she endorsed the items.
The chain later appealed the decision with their lawyer, Geoffrey Hobbs QC, arguing the garment was simply a “decorated T-shirt”. Despite lawyers admitting there was “no intention to create an appearance of an endorsement or promotion,” all three judges dismissed the appeal.
However, the court explained the decision does not pave the way for similar cases concerning other celebrities because of laws regarding UK image rights.
Copyright lawyer Paul Joseph told the BBC:
“The court was very keen to stress that there were specific facts that made Rihanna’s case stronger than usual.To get our news on your finger tip, Click here to add us up on bbm Channel C004869CD. Do you have any story for us Email us at maryanneyo2@gmail.com Follow Us
“The image that was used here was actually from the publicity material from her ‘Talk That Talk’ album.
“These particular factors would make the public think this T-shirt had been authorised by her.”
| Maryann Blog |
| maryann3n |
| maryann3n |
Post a Comment
PLACE YOUR COMMENT IN THE COMMENT BOX
EmoticonClick to see the code!
To insert emoticon you must added at least one space before the code.